A retirement income strategy is designed to provide incomes at different times to different recipients. However, the outcomes will depend on future events -- in our scenarios, longevity, investment returns and inflation. But it is helpful to consider the present value of prospective incomes and how it is distributed among the key recipients.

In this post I'll describe the basic approach used for the Present Value Analysis included in the RIS software; more details will follow in the next post.

To start, consider the problem of valuation of an investment in a share of Apple common stock. This is a claim that provides the owner with any future dividends that Apple might pay as well as the ability to sell the share at any future date. Since shares are traded publicly it is relatively straightforward to determine the market price, which represents a consensus opinion of the present value of Apple's future prospects. If you think the share is worth more, you may well want to buy more shares; if less, you may want to sell any shares you hold. But the market price reflects the overall evaluation of other investors. Economists define this as its present value and consider it a highly relevant measure.

Note that the price of an Apple share is based on its uncertain future prospects. In some possible scenario, future earnings and dividends will be disappointing and the prior price will turn out to have been too high. In another scenario, the future earnings and dividends will be spectacular and the prior price will turn out to have been too low. But the price today reflects investors' assessment of many different possible scenarios.

The RIS software takes the same approach when calculating the present values of prospective incomes. In particular, it generates a number of scenarios, each covering many years.

Now, imagine a large matrix (table) with 5,000 rows (one for each scenario) and 40 columns (one for each future year). In each cell of the matrix there is an income payment and an indication of the recipient (you and your partner, you alone, your partner alone, or your estate).

Next, imagine that for every cell in this matrix there is a number representing the present value of $1. For example, in row (scenario) 123, column (year) 10 there is a number representing the amount that investors would pay today to receive $1 in year 10 if and only if scenario 123 (and no other) happened. What would determine this value? First, the probability that the scenario would take place. And second, the state of the world in that scenario.

The probability is easily determined. In our simulation there are 5,000 scenarios so the probability that any one will occur is 1/5000. But there is good reason to believe that the prices will differ across scenarios.

To approach this in a more general context, economists use a concept that I like to term the

*price per chance*(PPC) for payment at a given future time in a given future state of the world. And there is good reason to assume that this value will depend on (1) the number of years before the state occurs and (2) the economic health of the economy in that state. In particular, it makes sense to assume that other things equal, the present (market) value of a future unit of purchasing power is greater for states of scarcity than for states of plenty. In our simulations the best available measure of the state of the economy is the future level of the real value of the market portfolio of world bonds and stocks. So we assume that the present value of $1 in a future state divided by the probability of that outcome depends on the number of years before the state occurs and on the cumulative real value of $1 invested in the market portfolio today and held until that future year. In sum, other things equal, the present value of $1 to be received in a given state divided by the probability is lower, the farther in the future the state and the smaller the cumulative return on the market over the period.
The

*pricing kernel*formula reflects these assumptions. It indicates the price (present value) per chance (probability) of $1 for a given state in the future. To return to our matrix with 5,000 rows (scenarios) and 40 columns (years), imagine that there is present value of $1 in each cell, computed by multiplying the corresponding price per chance by the probability (in this case, 1/5,000). Then we can value each cell's payment by multiplying the amount paid by the present value. Moreover we can sum up the present values of all the payments made to various recipients. In effect, this is what the RIS software does (although it actually updates sums as it creates scenarios in order to avoid the need to store large matrices). In addition, the software provides similar computations for any fees paid to financial advisors or others (as if they were stored in a second matrix).
Here is a result (based on a standard RMD account with 1% fees), obtained by clicking the

*Present Values*button under*Analyses*.
In this case the present value of the household's prospective incomes is roughly 70% of the total value of the future prospective payments. The present value of the estate's prospects are somewhat more than half of the remainder, with the present value of the financial advisor's prospects taking the rest.

I willl have more to say about these pie charts in future posts analyzing alternative strategies. But here are two generic observations.

First, only annuities offer reasonable income prospects for a household without providing valuable prospects for an estate. Moreover, different variations on a theme can substantially change the division of present value between the household and its estate, as can be seen by changing settings, then generating another set of scenarios.

Second, fees that may seem small may offer very valuable prospects for the person or organization charging the fees, with an associated decrease in the value of the prospects for the household and/or its estate. Note that in the figure above, a 1% fee is worth almost 1/8th of the total present value -- a cautionary tale.

Finally, some mechanics.

Present value calculations using a limited number of scenarios are subject to some error. I'll explore this more in subsequent posts, but suffice it to say that it is important to have at least 5,000 scenarios before making such a calculation. You will see that if the scenario settings called for fewer than 5,000 scenarios when you produced multiple scenarios, the Present Values analysis will politely refuse to give you any results. The solution is, of course, to change the scenario settings, then produce a new set of multiple scenarios.

You will notice also that there are no numbers given for the percentages of the various recipients' prospects. This was not an oversight. I chose to show only the pie chart in deference to the imprecision of the estimates. You can test the dependence of the results on the scenarios generated by pressing the multiple scenarios button again, generating a new set of scenarios, then seeing the resulting present value pie chart. With luck, the variation may be relatively slight. And the larger the number of scenarios, the smaller it should be.

Here's the bottom line. Any Monte Carlo analyses is at best an approximation of reality. It is a complex world out there. At best we can only hope that our models and simulations shed useful light on the relative prospects of different strategies.

Hi professor

ReplyDeleteThx for the post and blog. Very much enjoying it and learning from it.

Can you talk a little more about how you develop the discount rate in each cell? The idea of the discount rate changing by scenario i think is a very important one, and often ignored, so if you could elaborate a bit more about the "economic health of the economy in that state" and how it affects the discount rate could be of value.

Also, do you think it generally pay to look at analysis through the lens of PV or the end state? It likely depends on what question we are trying to solve but often times w retirement tools and with other simulation exercises we are looking at things at time horizon Z and evaluating the distribution , versus the distribution of other strategies (and maybe even applying some type of utility function to translate that distribution of outcomes into some type of score) at that point Z and not necessarily discounting the distribution of results back to today.

Many thanks!

Professor how do you prefer to be addressed?

ReplyDeleteA thought about the PV of Prospective Incomes based on a current client situation. Suppose the client would suggest a desired value of future prospective payments among recipients IE 80% household, 15% estate, 5% fees as his desired outcome. Could the calculation be reversed engineered via trial/error?

Thank you, Jim Hughes

for short term loans UK and No Credit Check Loans contact uk today loans service provider

ReplyDeleteThank you for this information. This is exactly what I was looking

ReplyDeleteNhững cách xóa nếp nhăn trên mặt

Trẻ hóa da ở đâu tốt nhất

Xóa nếp nhăn vùng mắt

Sử dụng kem chống nắng đúng cách

Office space Poole-The Vizz Business Centre - Find office space poole, bournemouth offices to let & offices in poole. Warehouse for easy access from various main routes in the area.

ReplyDeleteThese are some great tips. For those who could use some more specific advice, tips and information about great article thanks for posting.

ReplyDeletereal estate commission advance & Advance Commission

ReplyDeleteIt's true!Learning how to master your money is the only way for getting rich.

market neutral

ReplyDeleteIt's true!Learning how to master your money is the only way for getting rich.

market neutral

I appreciate your blog and very interesting information about the retired person good job.

ReplyDeleteHow to Retire With Enough Money

Online Income AD Posting

ReplyDeleteWays To Make Money Online USA

Online Income At Home

Well written piece

ReplyDeleteRolek Retirement Strategies CFP®

I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again.

ReplyDeleteExpress Commission

Real Estate Commission Loans