The previous post ("Analyzing Multiple Scenarios") showed how to generate multiple scenarios using the RIS software, then view the yearly income ranges using the Analysis routine titled (appropriately enough) "Yearly Incomes". The resulting graph shows the probabilities of exceeding alternative levels of income in each of the future years in the selected range.

In economic analyses of multiple years' incomes, it is often assumed that people have "time separable utility functions." In principle, a person with such preferences can evaluate the probabilities of alternative incomes in any given year, then calculate the "expected utility" of that range of possibilities. If in this manner the results for each of the future years are expressed in terms of present-day happiness, the expected utilities for each of the years can be added together to get a single measure of the overall desirability of the prospective future incomes. An individual preferences of this type can in theory determine the desirability of a strategy by studying only a graph showing yearly incomes with the accompanying information about the probability of being alive in each year. To be sure, even in this simplified setting, a couple would have to consider the probabilities of being alive and most people would want to include information about the possible amounts that could be left for an estate. But information on the changes in income from each year to the next would not be needed.

However, many people are in fact concerned with the extent to which their income might change from year to year. To accommodate them the RIS software also includes graphs showing at least some relevant information. On the Analysis page click the button labelled "Yr/Yr Incomes"; you will get a graph something like this:

In this case, each curve shows (on the vertical axis) the probability of exceeding a given value of a ratio of income divided by the prior year's income (X), shown on the horizontal axis. The ratios shown run from 0 to 2.0, with a ratio of 1.0 indicated by a green vertical line. As with the Yearly Income graph, the chance that one or both of you and your partner will be alive in a given year is shown in the upper right. Also, as with that graph, there are two variants. In the first, as in the case shown above, each graph starts at 100% and shows the ratios for cases in which at least one of the members of the household is alive. The other, shown below, plots the probabilities that the ratios will (1) exceed various levels and (2) that one or both of the members of the household will be alive.

The first item in the Analysis Settings determines which graph will be shown -- C(ontingent), as in our first example, or A(ctual), as in the second. As with the yearly income graph, the number of seconds of delay between years will be that indicated in the Analysis Settings.

It is important to understand how these graphs are constructed. With some exceptions, as each one of the multiple scenarios is generated, the ratio of each year's income to that of the prior year is calculated, with the result added to tables to be used to produce the graphs. Excluded are cases in which the recipient in a year differs from that in the prior year. Thus the final year in which any remaining savings goes to the estate is excluded as well as any year in which the household changes from two people to one (since some strategies call for changes in income in such instances that are not related to investment performance).

As with the yearly income graph, the year/year income graph should be interpreted as showing information available at the present time about the range of outcomes that could take place future years. For example, the range of possible year/year income ratios for years 19 and 20 is based on information available today. When year 19 actually arrives, the range of possible ratios of year 20 income to year 19 income will undoubtedly be very different, since many possible scenarios concerning the first 19 years will have failed to take place.

This distinction helps illustrate the difficulty of assessing the range of possible outcomes for any multi-year income strategy. There are simply too many income combinations to consider in detail. To emphasize the point, look at the graph below, showing the likelihoods of different combinations of income one and two years hence for a market-based strategy.

It is possible that someone with training and patience could study such a graph, compare it with another showing the likelihoods of incomes from some other strategy, then choose the preferred strategy. But most retirement income strategies have many more dimensions (years of income) than two. It is simply impossible to portray and assess alternative 40-dimensional probability distributions of income. One needs rather to concentrate on a manageable number of attributes. For some investors our yearly income graphs will suffice. Others may wish to also consider the year/year income graphs. More than that is beyond this project.

Hi william

ReplyDeleteBecause we can only evalute future outcomes given what we know today yet when we get to point X future scenarios will undoubtedly be different given, as you say, "many possible scenarios will have failed to take place" what should a person do? Simply run the analysis more frequently? For example, annually rerun using updated assumptiond and reflecting the actual path from x-1 to x?

Thx!

Hi Cifareto and William:

ReplyDeleteTo Cifareto comment, could one set a range of acceptable outcomes, then rerun using updated data?

Thanks for the education and insights. Our clients are realizing the value of bringing an economic perspective to their retirement planning.

Jim Hughes

I just had to say that your blog is by far the easiest to understand when it comes to retirement income planning. I'm walking my grandma through the steps right now, and if it weren't for this site I would have already given up. Instead, I'm feeling confident that we're going to make the right choice for a retirement community.

ReplyDeleteJenn | http://www.heritagecommons.com

for Payday Loans No Credit Check and quick payday loans contact uk today loans service provider

ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this informative article thanks for sharing.

ReplyDeleteReal Estate Commission Advance & Real Estate Cash Flow

Vey Nice Blog it Is Very Nice Information About retirement benefits And Certified Financial PlannerThank you for posting And Please Give Me More Info About SIP Mutual Funds.

ReplyDeleteThis information is really valuable. Lots of great info including saving for retirement is very important to enjoying and looking forward to retirement. Thanks admin for sharing this blog.Keep on sharing.

ReplyDeleteRetirement Income PlanningContents of this website are good and appreciative. Congratulation

ReplyDeleteExpress Commission

Real Estate Commission Loans

COEPD LLC- Center of Excellence for Professional Development is the most trusted online training platform to global participants. We are primarily a community of Business Analysts who have taken the initiative to facilitate professionals of IT or Non IT background with the finest quality training. Our trainings are delivered through interactive mode with illustrative scenarios, activities and case studies to help learners start a successful career. We impart knowledge keeping in view of the challenging situations individuals will face in the real time, so that they can handle their job deliverables with at most confidence.

ReplyDeletehttp://coepd.us/business-analyst-online-training.html

Very good website. I liked it very much.

ReplyDeleteCommission Advance

Commission Flow

Contents of this website are good and appreciative. Congratulation

ReplyDeleteExpress Commission

Real Estate Commission Loans